Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics of HIV-positive patients seen in our faculty; and to put forward the differences in virological response, immunological response and adverse effects of administered antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens in these patients.



Methods
: Medical records of 175 HIV-positive patients over 18 years old followed between 2003 and 2015 and have not been treated before, and regularly monitored for a minimum of six months from the beginning of the therapy were included in the study. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of patients were collected retrospectively. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 21.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used in statistical analysis of the study data.



Results
: Mostly used ART regimens in our outpatient clinic were ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) (n=102) and efavirenz (EFV) (n=39) combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC). Patients who used LPV/r were in a more advanced disease stage. Acquisition rate of virological response was 59% in the group receiving EFV and 53.9% in the group receiving LPV/r. The average increase in CD4+ T lymphocyte count at the sixth month of therapy was 258±222/μL in LPV/r group, 189±197/ μL in EFV group. The rate of increase in CD4+ T lymphocyte count was in favor of LPV/r group (p=0.017). Skipped drug doses (p=0.211), clinical adverse effects (p=0.276) and modification in ART regimen (p=0.044) were more common in EFV group. Increased cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level and decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level were seen mostly in LPV/r group. Increase in triglyceride level in EFV group and LPV/r group were 30.4% and 68.3%, respectively (p=0.005). Mortality was seen in 5 (2.9%) patients during follow-up.



Conclusions
: In terms of obtaining virological response, there was no difference between TDF/FTC+LPV/r group and TDF/FTC+EFV group; whereas LPV/r group had obtained a better immunological response. Modification in ART regimen was done more frequently in patients with EFV, while triglyceride levels were increased more in patients with LPV/r. 



Cite this article as
: Benli A, Başaran S, Şimşek-Yavuz S, Çağatay A, Öncül O, Özsüt H, Eraksoy H. [Comparison of antiretroviral therapy regimens in terms of virological response, immunological response and adverse effects in treatment-naive HIV-positive patients]. Klimik Derg. 2018; 31(2): 94-100. Turkish.

Volume 37, Issue 3 Volume 37, Issue 2 Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1