Early Release

Early Release / Review Article

Prof. Dr. Abdülkadir Noyan: Professional and Academic Aspects

Turhan Ada

Most Read

  1. Pneumococcal Vaccine as One of the Immunization Coverage Targets for Adulthood Vaccines: A Consensus Report of the Study Group for Adult Immunization of the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
  2. Does Hepatitis B Affect Erectile Dysfunction and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms?
  3. HIV Infection in Turkey: How Close Are We to the Target?
  4. Evaluation of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Had Undergone Liver Biopsy in Accordance With the Guidelines
  5. Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Diabetic Foot Wounds and Infections: Turkish Consensus Report
  6. When to Stop Antiviral Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B
  7. Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum: Their Role in Urogenital System Infections and Retrospective Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance Rates
  8. Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever: Treatment and Use of Ribavirin
  9. Modern Diagnostic Methods Used in Bacteriology: Rapid and Effective
  10. Analysis of HIV/AIDS-Related Stigma and Discrimination in Turkey: Results of the People Living With HIV Stigma Index

Volume 25, Issue 2

Original Article

Evaluation of In Vitro Activity of Fosfomycin and Other Antimicrobial Agents against Urinary Escherichia coli Isolates

Aslıhan Uzun
Affiliations
  • Tekirdağ Devlet Hastanesi, Mikrobiyoloji Laboratuvarı, Tekirdağ, Türkiye
,
Dumrul Gülen
Affiliations
  • Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Sağlık Yüksekokulu, Tekirdağ, Türkiye
,
Yeliz Tanrıverdi
Affiliations
  • Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Tekirdağ, Türkiye
,
Ayşe Demet Kaya
Affiliations
  • Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Tekirdağ, Türkiye
  • Escherichia coli
  • Fosfomycin
  • Urinary tract infections

Abstract

Objective: Fosfomycin is an antimicrobial agent commonly used in uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The objective of this study is to evaluate in vitro activity of fosfomycin against Escherichia coli strains isolated from urine specimens. 

Methods: Data were retrieved from two hospitals in Tekirdağ, Turkey. We retrospectively examined the susceptibility results of E. coli strains collected over one year (January 2010-March 2011) to fosfomycin. Susceptibility of the isolates was determined by the disk diffusion method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria. 

Results: A total of 561 E. coli strains were examined and 34 (6.1%) of the isolates were resistant to fosfomycin. Resistance was highest amongst isolates taken from outpatients (73.52%) and from the urology clinics (47.05%). In vitro activities of 561 isolates against other antimicrobial agents were also evaluated. Resistance rates of the strains against ampicillin-sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, and amikacin were 44.8%, 19.4%, 18.1%, 15.1%, and 11.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: According to data obtained from this study, fosfomycin seems to have good levels of in vitro activity against urinary E. coli isolates in our region. Further evaluation of its potential clinical effectiveness is needed in followup to these in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility results. 

  • 77-80
  • 10.5152/kd.2012.21
  • July 23, 2019
  • 2211
  • 973
Download as PDF
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC
Volume 37, Issue 3 Volume 37, Issue 2 Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1