Most Read

  1. Pneumococcal Vaccine as One of the Immunization Coverage Targets for Adulthood Vaccines: A Consensus Report of the Study Group for Adult Immunization of the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
  2. Does Hepatitis B Affect Erectile Dysfunction and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms?
  3. HIV Infection in Turkey: How Close Are We to the Target?
  4. Evaluation of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Had Undergone Liver Biopsy in Accordance With the Guidelines
  5. Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Diabetic Foot Wounds and Infections: Turkish Consensus Report
  6. When to Stop Antiviral Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B
  7. Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum: Their Role in Urogenital System Infections and Retrospective Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance Rates
  8. Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever: Treatment and Use of Ribavirin
  9. Modern Diagnostic Methods Used in Bacteriology: Rapid and Effective
  10. A Case of Generalized Tetanus With a Short Incubation Period
  11. Analysis of HIV/AIDS-Related Stigma and Discrimination in Turkey: Results of the People Living With HIV Stigma Index
  12. Does Anti-HIV Positivity in Pregnancy Suggest the Requirement of HIV Prophylaxis for Newborn?

Volume 33, Issue 1

Original Article

Investigation of Fosfomycin and Chloramphenicol Susceptibility of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains

Barış Ata Borsa
Affiliations
  • Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye
,
Zeynep Güngördü-Dalar
Affiliations
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye
,
Asiye Karakullukçu
Affiliations
  • Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, Gümüşhane, Türkiye
,
Veli Cengiz Özalp
Affiliations
  • Konya Gıda ve Tarım Üniversitesi, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Biyomühendislik Bölümü, Konya, Türkiye
,
Gökhan Aygün
Affiliations
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye
  • carbapenems
  • chloramphenicol
  • Fosfomycin
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objective: Antimicrobial resistance is one of the most important health problems of recent years. Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains have been causing serious problems in many countries including Turkey in recent years. Aim of this study was to detect molecular mechanisms behind the carbapenem resistance in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains isolated from rectal swab samples and investigate the susceptibility of two potentially alternative drugs, fosfomycin, and chloramphenicol.

Methods: 46 K. pneumoniae strains isolated from rectal screening cultures of intensive care unit patients by using MacConkey agar containing 2 mg/L meropenem were included in this study. Carbapenem resistance of strains were confirmed by minimum inhibitor concentrations of meropenem obtained with gradient strip test. Presence of the blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA, blaIMP and blaVIM genes were investigated by the real-time polymerase chain reaction. Broth microdilution method was used to investigate chloramphenicol susceptibility, and gradient strip test was used to investigate fosfomycin susceptibility of the strains.

Results: At least one carbapenemase gene was detected in all K. pneumoniae strains. While all strains were found positive for the presence of OXA-48 type carbapenemase gene, 12 (26%) out of 46 were positive for both OXA-48 and NDM-1 carbapenemase genes, and only one (2%) strain was positive for OXA-48, NDM-1, and IMP-1 carbapenemase genes. Only 3 (6%) out of 46 strains were found susceptible to fosfomycin while 23 (50%) of them were susceptible to chloramphenicol. Additionally, we observed that the resistance rates to fosfomycin and chloamphenicol tended to be higher among carbapenemase producers.

Conclusions: It is estimated that fosfomycin is not going to be a good option for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains in Turkey since only 6% of them were susceptible. Although the chloramphenicol susceptibility rate (50%) was higher than fosfomycin, further clinical studies are required to provide a better knowledge about the usage of this antibiotic in systemic infections. Moreover, multiple carbapenemase producers tended to be more resistant to fosfomycin and also chloramphenicol.

Klimik Dergisi 2020; 33(1): 15-8.

Cite this article as: Borsa BA, Güngördü-Dalar Z, Karakullukçu A, Özalp VC, Aygün G. [Investigation of fosfomycin and chloramphenicol susceptibility of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains]. Klimik Derg. 2020; 33(1): 15-8. Turkish.

  • 15-18
  • 10.5152/kd.2020.03
  • April 29, 2020
  • 1948
  • 710
Download as PDF
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC
Volume 37, Issue 3 Volume 37, Issue 2 Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1