Most Read

  1. Pneumococcal Vaccine as One of the Immunization Coverage Targets for Adulthood Vaccines: A Consensus Report of the Study Group for Adult Immunization of the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
  2. Does Hepatitis B Affect Erectile Dysfunction and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms?
  3. HIV Infection in Turkey: How Close Are We to the Target?
  4. Evaluation of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Had Undergone Liver Biopsy in Accordance With the Guidelines
  5. Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Diabetic Foot Wounds and Infections: Turkish Consensus Report
  6. When to Stop Antiviral Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B
  7. Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum: Their Role in Urogenital System Infections and Retrospective Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance Rates
  8. Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever: Treatment and Use of Ribavirin
  9. Modern Diagnostic Methods Used in Bacteriology: Rapid and Effective
  10. A Case of Generalized Tetanus With a Short Incubation Period
  11. Analysis of HIV/AIDS-Related Stigma and Discrimination in Turkey: Results of the People Living With HIV Stigma Index
  12. Does Anti-HIV Positivity in Pregnancy Suggest the Requirement of HIV Prophylaxis for Newborn?

Volume 32, Issue 1

Original Article

Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum: Their Role in Urogenital System Infections and Retrospective Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance Rates

Nazmiye Ülkü Tüzemen
Affiliations
  • Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bursa, Türkiye
,
Kadir Efe
Affiliations
  • Dörtçelik Çocuk Hastalıkları Hastanesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Laboratuvarı, Bursa, Türkiye
,
Cüneyt Özakın
Affiliations
  • Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bursa, Türkiye
  • drug resistance
  • Mycoplasma hominis
  • Ureaplasma urealyticum

Abstract

Objective: Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum are opportunistic pathogens which can frequently be isolated from genitourinary tracts in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence, epidemiologic features and antibiotic susceptibility of M. hominis and U. urealyticum agents in urine specimens which were sent from various clinics of Uludağ University, Hospital of Health Application and Research Center for diagnosis of genitourinary system infection.

Methods: Urinary specimen results of M. hominis and U. urealyticum were retrospectively reviewed between January 2015 and December 2016 in our hospital. Urinary specimens were examined using Mycoplasma IES (Autobio Diagnostics, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China) in 2015 and Biosynex® Mycoplasmatest (Biosynex, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) in 2016 for the identification of M. hominis and U. urealyticum. Simultaneous urine culture and complete urinalysis results were compared with results of M. hominis and U. urealyticum.

Results: In our study, we evaluated 5852 samples of 2926 patients comprising 67.43% females and 32.57% males for detection of M. hominis and U. urealyticum in urine. While U. urealyticum, and M. hominis were detected in 22.25% (651/2926) and 1.23% (36/2926) of the samples, respectively; coinfection was detected in 3.79% (111/2926). M. hominis and/or U. urealyticum positivity (n=798/2926) were found to be 32.12% in women and 11.02% in men. Resistance rates of M. hominis according to sex were found to be higher in women for ciprofloxacin and a statistically significant difference was found (χ2=4.336, p=0.037).

Conclusions: As there was no growth in routine urine cultures of about half of the M. hominis and/or U. urealyticum-positive patients, it is recommended to consider the presence of urogenital M. hominis and U. urealyticum infections for treatment and to use laboratory tests for the diagnosis of these agents especially in the presence of risky conditions such as pregnancy. Klimik Dergisi 2019; 32(1): 40-5.

Cite this article as: Tüzemen NÜ, Efe K, Özakın C. [Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum: their role in urogenital system infections and retrospective evaluation of antibiotic resistance rates]. Klimik Derg. 2019; 32(1): 40-5. Turkish.

  • 40-45
  • 10.5152/kd.2019.10
  • July 23, 2019
  • 5447
  • 935
Download as PDF
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC
Volume 37, Issue 3 Volume 37, Issue 2 Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1