Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the patient factors which increase the probability of achieving a positive blood culture, distribution of microorganisms grown, and to reveal the impact of various factors during collection of blood on blood culture positivity.



Methods
: Blood cultures of patients with a body temperature of ≥38°C and compatible with a clinical sepsis definition of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sent to the clinical microbiology laboratory were evaluated. In this prospective case-control study, patients who had a positive blood culture composed case group, and culture-negative ones formed control group. Relationship between blood culture positivity and factors such as gender, being ≥65 years old age, presence of a chronic illness, a urinary or central venous catheter (CVC), immunosuppression, antimicrobial therapy, hospitalization and its duration in both groups were evaluated. Furthermore, antimicrobial use during blood collection, puncture site for blood collection, inoculum volume of bottles in a blood culture set, and time to positivity after blood inoculation into culture bottles were recorded.



Results
: A total of 251 patients with clinical sepsis were included in the study. 122 patients fell into case group, and 129 patients fell into control group. Mean blood inoculum volume for bottles in a blood culture set was 11.45±4.4 mL in case group, whereas it was 12.3±3.8 mL in control group (p=0.122). In multivariate analyses, patients with an indwelling CVC, a chronic illness, and blood collection from different peripheral veins simultaneously or in 5- or 10-minute intervals were more likely to have positive blood cultures 2.5, 2.4 and 6.8 times, respectively.



Conclusions
: Blood cultures drawn from patients with fever, particularly in the presence of CVC and chronic illness, are crucial in terms of establishing causative agents and arranging rational antimicrobial therapy. Also, it is remarkable that drawing blood from different peripheral veins simultaneously or in 5- or 10-minute intervals shortens the time to start empirical antimicrobials. Moreover, it is possible to consider a reduction in the incubation period of blood cultures from 10 days to eight days, if there is no suspicion of fastidious agents or presence of particular patient groups.



Cite this article as
: Bolukçu S, Başaran S, Çağatay A, Özsüt H, Eraksoy H. [Prospective assessment of blood cultures which were sent to the clinical microbiology laboratory]. Klimik Derg. 2018; 31(2): 120-4. Turkish.

Volume 37, Issue 4 Volume 37, Issue 3 Volume 37, Issue 2 Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1