Abstract

Objective: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial treatment in patients with BSI and its effect on mortality and hospital stay.

Methods: 100 BSI-diagnosed patients aged 18 and older were included in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics, clinical and microbiological data, empirically initiated treatments, time to appropriate treatment, 10th-day (early period) and hospital discharge mortality rates, and lengths of hospital stay were recorded. Data were analyzed using Pearson χ², Fisher’s exact test, trend χ² test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regression assessed the impact on mortality, with p <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: 51% of cases were female, and the median age was 64 (min-max=19-94). No significant difference was found between appropriate and inappropriate antibiotic treatment groups in age, sex, clinical severity, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores, and microorganism distribution. However, multidrug-resistant organisms were significantly more common in the inappropriate empiric treatment group (p=0.001). Of all BSIs, 57% were hospital-acquired, and 43% were community-onset, with primary BSIs accounting for 55%. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of where BSI was acquired and its source. Empiric treatment appropriateness was 57%, with resistance among microorganisms being the main factor in inappropriate treatment. Early period (10th-day) mortality was 26%, and hospital discharge mortality was 41%, with no significant association found between the empiric treatment, appropriateness, time to appropriate treatment, and mortality. However, inappropriate empiric treatment was significantly associated with higher hospital discharge mortality (p=0.033) in immunocompetent patients. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the appropriate empiric treatment group compared to the inappropriate group (p=0.035).

Conclusion: We did not find significant impact of the appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment and time to appropriate treatment on mortality but appropriate treatment significantly shortened hospital stays.

Volume 37, Issue 3 Volume 37, Issue 2 Volume 37, Issue 1 Volume 36, Issue 4 Volume 36, Supplement 1 Volume 36, Issue 3 Volume 36, Issue 2 Volume 36, Issue 1 Volume 35, Issue 4 Volume 35, Issue 3 Volume 35, Issue 2 Volume 35, Issue 1 Volume 34, Issue 3 Volume 34, Issue 2 Volume 34, Issue 1 Volume 33, Issue 3 Volume 33, Issue 2 Volume 33, Issue 1 Volume 32, Issue 3 Volume 32, Supplement 1 Volume 32, Supplement 2 Volume 32, Issue 2 Volume 32, Issue 1 Volume 31, Issue 3 Volume 31, Issue 2 Volume 31, Supplement 1 Volume 31, Issue 1 Volume 30, Issue 3 Volume 30, Issue 2 Volume 30, Supplement 1 Volume 30, Issue 1 Volume 29, Issue 3 Volume 29, Issue 2 Volume 29, Issue 1 Volume 28, Supplement 1 Volume 28, Issue 3 Volume 28, Issue 2 Volume 28, Issue 1 Volume 27, Supplement 1 Volume 27, Issue 3 Volume 27, Issue 2 Volume 27, Issue 1 Volume 26, Issue 3 Volume 26, Supplement 1 Volume 26, Issue 2 Volume 26, Issue 1 Volume 25, Issue 3 Volume 25, Issue 2 Volume 25, Issue 1 Volume 24, Issue 3 Volume 24, Issue 2 Volume 24, Issue 1 Volume 23, Issue 3 Volume 23, Issue 2 Volume 23, Issue 1 Volume 22, Issue 3 Volume 22, Issue 2 Volume 22, Issue 1 Volume 21, Issue 3 Volume 21, Supplement 2 Volume 21, Supplement 1 Volume 21, Issue 2 Volume 21, Issue 1 Volume 20, Issue 3 Volume 20, Supplement 2 Volume 20, Issue 2 Volume 20, Issue 1 Volume 20, Supplement 1 Volume 19, Issue 3 Volume 19, Issue 2 Volume 19, Issue 1 Volume 18, Issue 3 Volume 18, Supplement 1 Volume 18, Issue 2 Volume 18, Issue 1 Volume 17, Issue 3 Volume 17, Issue 2 Volume 17, Issue 1 Volume 16, Issue 3 Volume 16, Issue 2 Volume 16, Issue 1 Volume 1, Supplement 1 Volume 15, Issue 3 Volume 15, Issue 2 Volume 15, Issue 1 Volume 14, Issue 3 Volume 14, Issue 2 Volume 14, Issue 1 Volume 13, Issue 3 Volume 13, Issue 2 Volume 13, Supplement 1 Volume 13, Issue 1 Volume 12, Issue 3 Volume 12, Issue 2 Volume 12, Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 3 Volume 11, Issue 2 Volume 11, Supplement 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 Volume 10, Issue 3 Volume 10, Issue 2 Volume 10, Issue 1 Volume 9, Issue 3 Volume 9, Issue 2 Volume 9, Issue 1 Volume 8, Issue 3 Volume 8, Issue 2 Volume 8, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 3 Volume 7, Issue 1 Volume 7, Issue 2 Volume 7, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 3 Volume 5, Issue 1 Volume 5, Issue 2 Volume 5, Issue 3 Volume 6, Issue 1 Volume 6, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 1 Volume 3, Issue 2 Volume 3, Issue 3 Volume 4, Issue 1 Volume 4, Issue 2 Volume 1, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 1 Volume 2, Issue 2 Volume 2, Issue 3 Volume 1, Issue 1